mxx1's avatar

Philosophy 101


1. What is the Infinite Possibility Theorem (loosely defined)?

In philosophy, physics, and logic, this often refers to the idea that:

“Given infinite time, space, or universes, every possible configuration of matter or information will eventually occur.”

This is closely tied to:

Modal logic: All things that are logically possible exist in some world.

Eternal return: In infinite time, events may recur.

Multiple universes: Every possible outcome branches into its own timeline.

Library of Babel-style combinatorics: Every book that could exist, exists.

Then there’s the monkeys flailing away at the works of Shakespeare. Fun fact – this is how many seconds it would take one monkey to randomly reproduce all the known works of Shakespeare: 3.62e+9712034

2. How It Interacts with Determinable but Epistemically Closed Facts ( DECFs)

a. DECFs Belong to a Fixed Universe

DECFs are not about what is possible – they are about what did happen in your actual world, but went unrecorded. They represent one point in the space of all possible realities.

For example, there is an exact number of times you’ve been to the toilet in your life. However, unless someone has recorded each and every time for you, you can never know the exact number.

DCEFs counterpose infinite possibility with singular certainty.

You didn’t go to the toilet 7,543 times in one timeline and 6,112 in another. You went exactly 6,749 times. That’s the real number, even if you’ll never know it.

b. DECFs Shrink the Infinite

Infinite possibility expands what could be true.

DECFs remind you that only one path was taken, and the others are inaccessible – not just physically, but epistemologically.

The infinite multiverse may contain every version of your life. But you only lived one of them, and you can’t even fully access that one.

This makes DECFs almost tragic:

Infinite possible versions of you exist.

You only get one.

And you don’t even get to know it all.

c. They Conflict at the Boundaries of Knowledge

Infinite possibility suggests:

“All truths are somewhere, accessible in some universe.”

DECFs say:

“There is a specific truth here, in this universe – but you can never reach it.”

It’s an epistemological hard stop inside a metaphysical infinity machine.

3. Philosophical Implication

This creates a beautiful and slightly disturbing tension:

In a universe of infinite possibilities, the only one that actually happened is partially unknowable.

It’s like living in a single pixel of the Library of Babel, knowing that your life has a precise record – but the book was printed, then burned.

Conclusion

The multiverse may be real, but DECFs assert:

You only have one track, and

You can’t fully know that one.

So from an existential perspective, the multiverse doesn’t matter because epistemic closure happens even in a single deterministic timeline.

In this sense, DECFs don’t deny multiple universe theory, but they reduce its explanatory power for questions of meaning, self, or truth.