mxx1's avatar

Fonzi

Fucking seriously, I am not jumping the shark.

This morning, while riding down the Brisbane river near the city (on my bike), I saw a 1 meter bull-shark jump right out of the water and belly flop back in.

It wasn’t my imagination – see http://www.smh.com.au/environment/leaping-sharks-are-no-bull-20100906-14wyq.html

mxx1's avatar

Bison Lust Disorder

Is it just me? So what’s wrong with this Linked-in offering?

“Chasing my dream of being a bison farmer in Australia took my husband and I to the other side of the world researching this beautiful animal.”

mxx1's avatar

Why we’re fucked

Australian CEO’s back corporate tax cuts because:

“Tax cuts drive investment”

No they don’t. Investment is usually a before tax expense.

Tax cuts drive higher dividends and larger CEO bonuses.

Why would an oligarchy invest into a saturated services market anyway? They can’t extract any more money out of the market, unless its at the expense of a competitor.

No new jobs will be created, as the govt claims.

Tax cuts will result in shareholders taking more money off the table, fueling wealth disparity, which results in a smaller pool of money available for consumption of goods and services.

Corporate tax cuts will reduce the market size for our big corporates. The CEOs don’t care; this won’t become obvious until after they have their large houses and boats, yada.

mxx1's avatar

Delta

The difference between an artist and a craftist is that the former must have a mental illness. It’s what makes their work interesting. Technically, both can be just as competent as each other, but the craftist is just too sane to be interesting.

Note carefully though, your artist can’t be completely bonkers or else they can’t viably pretend to be sane, which is a characteristic hallmark of their artistic mental illness. Usually, laughably so.

mxx1's avatar

The feminist

A feminist is what?

Well, without a doubt, she is a generaliser.

She makes bold claims about the psychology and behaviour of each of the sexes.

Usually she ignores Bertrand Russell’s warning that there is nothing noble about the oppressed.

Typically she is well meaning.

And outraged.

And often she is right.

But she may lack wisdom and not clearly see the consequences of her actions.

Often she will not care about any collateral damage; this is, after all, a holy caliphate and there is always casualties in war, right?

She will be energised by any resistance to her preaching.

In short, she will be judged by history as all liberators are.

Parasympathetically psychotic.

mxx1's avatar

Query

Am I being too hard on Thorsten?

Or will he be a victim of my distaste for confrontation?

He started it, being all messed up about me having all those shares.

Then getting emotional about meet being involved in M1 product development.

Well he’s fucked himself, that’s for sure. I own one third of the company and can’t be removed.

He’s made it him or me, and he had no idea.

I feel guilty, a little. But there no room for sentiment in business.

mxx1's avatar

LoL

In an article about former world formula 1 champion, Denny Hulme:

“Hulme’s death by heart attack, whilst driving a BMW M3 during the Bathurst 1000 race in Australia, made him the seventh former Formula One champion to die, and the first to die of natural causes (versus three racing incidents, two incidents on public roads and one incident involving aircraft.)”

You’d think a heart attack during the Bathurst race would count as a racing incident…

mxx1's avatar

Pseudo-Cleft Sentences With Wh-Clauses

The pseudo-cleft sentence is a device whereby, like the cleft sentence proper, the construction can make explicit the division between given and new parts of the communication. It is essentially an SVC sentence with a nominal relative clause as subject or complement. . . .

 subject+linking verb+complement

i.e. linking verb=connects the s+complement=describes the subject

e.g I am sexy. The bread smells good.”

The pseudo-cleft sentence occurs more typically with the wh-clause as subject, since it can thus present a climax in the complement:

Wh-clauses are what, when, where, who, which, why and how.

“What you need most is a good rest.”

It is less restricted than the cleft sentence . . . in one respect, since, through use of the substitute verb ‘do’ (in the following examples), it more freely permits marked focus to fall on the predication:

What he’s done is (to) spoil the whole thing. What John did to his suit was (to) ruin it. What I’m going to do to him is (to) teach him a lesson. In each of these, we would have an anticipatory focus on the do item, the main focus coming at normal end-focus position.” (Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik, A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, 1985)

“What is striking is that the wh-clause of the pseudocleft anticipates (or ‘projects’) up-coming talk by the same speaker, and . . . FRAMES that talk in terms of such categories as event, action and paraphrase.”