Anti-Eveythingers
So I sent my last blog on anti-vaxxers to Rod and got this response:
“me-thinks Bill Gates is not an altruist … especially since his dad was a acolyte of eugenics … and Govt is for the most part filled with brainwashed twats that wldnt know a false flag operation to save themselves … a lot of people are just starting to awaken and to question the hierarchical control system that lurks in the shadows.”
Now I’d put Rod in the first category of anti-vaxxers; those that are general conspiracy theorists without kids of a vaccination age.
These guys are just using the issue to vent their general disliking of the current first world systems that they find themselves in.
What I am struggling with is whether Rod’s partial and selective use of rationale thought is to be admired or to be found disturbing.
I sense a set of disconnected dots that Rod has somehow mentally drawn together in order to arrive at a conclusion which I don’t think is fully articulated.
I am not saying that I don’t agree with him; I can agree nor disagree because I don’t understand what data he has used, how he has drawn a conclusion, nor what his conclusion is.
I do sense a negative vibe towards all forms of authority and that’s about it.
What I do know is that there isn’t enough data nor process for anyone else to reproduce his efforts.
I was taught was that this ability to reproduce the process is the point of all rationale methodologies.
Once you can see what data was used, and how, then you can also assess the strengths and weaknesses of the whole shebang.
Without any such due process, I either have to take Rod at his word, or more likely put some pretty big mental error bars on whatever missives I receive from him.
The irony of course is that people that don’t use any form of due process to sort through data and to derive conclusions also don’t question the absence of such, and therefore don’t apply error bars under any circumstances.
Which is to say, even if by some odd miracle Rod has found a vein of truth, the only people listening are those who don’t give a stuff if it’s true or not, nor do they have any influence of any sort.
That probably suits Rod just fine despite any complaints to the other that he may make for appearance’s sake.
