Letter of Intent

Rainbows, rainbows everywhere.

I am very happy for all the same sex couples in America that want to be married.

The supreme court judge did say in his final judgment ‘same-sex couples must not be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions.’

Now right there though, I spot a weakness in the crusade.

How on earth can exclusion from a constitutional right such a marriage contract condemn anyone to loneliness?

Marriage isn’t now, and never was a contract between the state and two people.

It is, and always will be a letter of intent between two people.

The state is just a witness to the letter of intent.

Personally I don’t give a shit who the witness is, or even if there is a witness.

But I do recognise that most people look to higher authorities to validate their actions and feelings.

I am just the odd one out in this context, so good on you Supreme Court.

Of course, now there will be a battle royale between God and the State in the USA.

And in this context the Supreme Court was also possibly motivated by assuring their ascendency over those that see God as a higher authority.

Essentially they are getting on the front foot in the battle for control of the federation of the un-united states of America.

wpid-img_20150617_163847.jpg

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.